I'm not convinced this is a useful test because the performance
characteristics seem unfortunately nuanced: if the test fails, it implies
you shouldn't add more but that isn't necessarily true (for example, if
your RV child has a large depth). Furthermore, we haven't measured in a
variety of circumstances that layouts like LinearLayout perform better
as RecyclerView children so maybe it only held for the one small case we
used it in.
STATE_HALF_EXPANDED cannot be disabled while also keeping fitToContents = true
based on which the tabs tray layout is currently set.
To work around this we'll set a a minuscule height for the tab tray when in
this state and then immediately advance to STATE_HIDDEN so to make it
imperceptible to the users.
Since I couldn't write unit tests because of InflateExceptions in Robolectric
I've written UI tests to protect against regressions.
* For #15278: added CoroutineManager to count runBlocking calls
* For #15278: Added actual detekt rule for runblocking and its config to the yaml
* For #15278: Added unit test for RunblockingCounter
* For #15278: renamed StrictModeStartupSuppressionCountTest.kt to PerformanceStartupTest.kt and added runBlockingCount test
* Lint fix
* For #15278: made runblocking a Long to prevent overflow
* For #15278: fixed MozRunblocking name, description and moved RunBlockingCounter to perf package
* For #15278:Renamed MozillaRunblockingCheck to MozillaRunBlockingCheck
* For #15278: Added setup for unit test, since it failed without restting counter
* For #15278: Fixed naming for RunBlocking lint check
* For #15278: removed changes made to test to use runBlockingIncrement
* For #15728: added test exclusion for runBlocking check
* For #15278: changed null check and added Synchronized to count setter
* For #15278: fix for nits
* For #15278: added StartupExcessiveResourceUseTest to CODEOWNERS
* For #15278: fixed for nits
* For #15278: Moved increment function to extension function and fixed indentation
* For #15278: Added tests for Atomic Integer extension and nit fix
* Ability to rename top sites, closes#9548
* Highlight the "Remove" top site action as destructive
With more menu items in the top site contextual menu, it makes sense to differentiate
* Added test for the top site renaming action
* Fixed lint check (wildcard imports, blank spaces)
* Applied suggestions from code review
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Luong <gabriel.luong@gmail.com>
* Implemented dialog click listener with manual dismiss/cancel
Co-authored-by: Lorenzo Stanco <lorenzo.stanco@gmail.com>
